The Big Promise: Transparency Equals Stability For decades, economists from the Chicago School pushed a simple idea: If central banks clearly communicate their monetary policy—no surprises, no sudden shifts—then markets will stabilize. Sounds reasonable on the surface. Milton Friedman argued that steady, predictable money supply growth would eliminate economic shocks. Robert Lucas doubled down, claiming that if people expect monetary expansion, they’ll adjust behavior accordingly—neutralizing its impact. In theory, this creates a calm, predictable system. In reality? That’s not how the world works. The Fatal Flaw: Money Is Never Neutral Here’s the part they gloss over. Money doesn’t enter the system evenly. It never has. When new money is created, it hits certain hands first—banks, institutions, insiders. These early recipients…

Continue reading as a Citizen

Dedollarize News is free to read for signed-up members. Become a Citizen to finish this article, save what matters, and get the daily “While You Were Distracted” briefing.

No credit card required.