The Clarity Act Isn’t About “Clarity”—It’s About Control Let’s cut through the polished language. When politicians start throwing around terms like “clarity” in financial legislation, what they usually mean is control—defined rules that lock in who gets to operate, who gets squeezed out, and who gets watched. The proposed Clarity Act is being framed as a necessary step toward regulating digital assets and stablecoins in the United States. On the surface, that sounds reasonable. Markets need structure, right? But look closer. This isn’t just about protecting investors. It’s about building a permissioned system where innovation can only exist under regulatory oversight—and where every transaction can be tracked, flagged, and potentially restricted. Banks aren’t speaking loudly about it. That silence should…
Continue reading as a Citizen
Dedollarize News is free to read for signed-up members. Become a Citizen to finish this article, save what matters, and get the daily “While You Were Distracted” briefing.
No credit card required.
